http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/8395971.stm
Lately the amount of options available to consumers when buying a eco-friendly car has dramatically increased compared to previous years but until there is more infrastructure to support this new technology this phenomenon will remain out of the mainstream market. One of the causes of this recent transition can be blamed on the introduction of high taxes and more stringent legislation aimed at penalizing gas-guzzler drivers by governments in countries around the world. Another recent contributer has been the wide variety of green cars including hybrids, electric batter powered, and other experimental models that have become available to the public in just the last few years. Unfortunately although there is a wide range of models for customer to choose from the existing infrastructure for powering these vehicles cannot compare to the world wide network of gas stations available to petroleum powered cars. Also the technology of these green vehicles is incapable of comparing to the convenience of traditionally fueled cars. For example charging the lithium-ion battery of an electric car can take up to eight hours. Luckily there have been many novel ideas to solve these problems that would allow electric and other types of fuel to become more mainstream. These ideas include new technology such as wireless charging to make fueling more accessible. However until this infrastructure is implemented these new forms of fuel will have trouble competing in the consumer market.
Technology like novel fuel types have the potential to shape society as a whole. As this technology becomes more prominent society will have to evolve to accommodate this type of innovation so that people can take advantage of the benefits of these devices. Even before this technology becomes accepted society will change implementing the infrastructure that is required to make it acceptable to everyone who can take advantage of these new tools.
Reference:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10122072-54.html?tag=mncol;txt
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Journal 14, November 29th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10404450-17.html?tag=mncol;txt
According to a study by two Swiss human rights organizations, the Trial and Pro Juventute, a number of video games portray acts that in real life would be considered war crimes and violate international human rights laws. The study was interested in discovering if playing these games would make a person more inclined to break international law including International Humanitarian Law, the basics of International Human Rights Law, and International Criminal Law. The study involved allowing a group of young gamers to play twenty different games while supervised by three attorneys to identify if any actions the game players were making would be illegal in a real world setting. The conductors of the study said that it was not their intent to ban the games or alter them in any way but to work with developers in order to insure that future games would take international human rights into consideration before releasing them to the public. The study revealed that shooter games were the most prominent genre to neglect current human rights laws in their representation of realistic scenarios. Without any type of standard for including inhumane acts such as desecrating monuments, harming civilians, and torture gamers are allowed to experience actions that would be severely punished even in times of war. The groups who organized the study recommend that developers take special care to avoid allowing players to violate international human rights even in a game setting and in areas that reflect times of war and battle scenes.
Even though games have a notorious record for exposing players to violent and often criminal situations there is little evidence to support that this exposure correlates to the players' actions outside of the game. It has been cited on multiple occasions that games like movies are a form of creative expression that cannot be stifled due to freedom of expression rights. This however does not mean that a developer is unable to relay its message without the depiction of war crimes. There is more than one way to tell a story and there is often a perfectly acceptable way that does not allow the breaking of international law in a game setting.
Reference:
http://allpsych.com/journal/violentmedia.html
According to a study by two Swiss human rights organizations, the Trial and Pro Juventute, a number of video games portray acts that in real life would be considered war crimes and violate international human rights laws. The study was interested in discovering if playing these games would make a person more inclined to break international law including International Humanitarian Law, the basics of International Human Rights Law, and International Criminal Law. The study involved allowing a group of young gamers to play twenty different games while supervised by three attorneys to identify if any actions the game players were making would be illegal in a real world setting. The conductors of the study said that it was not their intent to ban the games or alter them in any way but to work with developers in order to insure that future games would take international human rights into consideration before releasing them to the public. The study revealed that shooter games were the most prominent genre to neglect current human rights laws in their representation of realistic scenarios. Without any type of standard for including inhumane acts such as desecrating monuments, harming civilians, and torture gamers are allowed to experience actions that would be severely punished even in times of war. The groups who organized the study recommend that developers take special care to avoid allowing players to violate international human rights even in a game setting and in areas that reflect times of war and battle scenes.
Even though games have a notorious record for exposing players to violent and often criminal situations there is little evidence to support that this exposure correlates to the players' actions outside of the game. It has been cited on multiple occasions that games like movies are a form of creative expression that cannot be stifled due to freedom of expression rights. This however does not mean that a developer is unable to relay its message without the depiction of war crimes. There is more than one way to tell a story and there is often a perfectly acceptable way that does not allow the breaking of international law in a game setting.
Reference:
http://allpsych.com/journal/violentmedia.html
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Journal 13, November 22nd
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/technology/22distracted.html?_r=1&ref=technology
Technology has recently surfaced that will disable cellphones while the owner is driving. The purpose of this new gadgetry is to attempt to reduce accident rates due to driver negligence while using cellphones while on the road. Instead of just turning off the cellphone which requires the user going against human nature and their developed addiction to the device the cellphone is rendered inactive as soon as the car starts moving. This insures that the driver will remain focused on the road without having to fear being interrupted by a call or text message. This technology works by using the phone's GPS to estimate the car's speed and there by only activate the phone when the vehicle is off the road. This latest form of technology is currently being evaluated in relation to the increasingly popular hands-free option which also attempts to provide for the safer use of cellphones in cars. Currently prominent companies such as Ford and Microsoft have backed hands-free technology by implementing systems that use features such as voice dialing and reading text messages aloud. While hands-free technology can assist drivers remain focused while placing calls some insurance companies are wary if benefits can last once the driver has become engrossed in the conversation. Though hands-free methods have been put to good use recently consumers and companies have started to consider safer alternatives such the call blocking technology. Recently Community Coffee a firm based out of Baton Rouge implemented this technology in 400 of their trucks and saw a 30% decrease in accident rates. Due to these and similar results insurance companies are starting to offer benefits for customers that agree to use this technology in their vehicles. If the technology can catch on it can decrease accident rates while decreasing the costs of automobile insurance.
This technology provides obvious benefits in the way of safety while driving. If drivers start to use new gadgets like this there is sure to be a drop in accident rates. While hand-free technology allows users to more safely access their phones it does factor in the lack of focus once the driver is on the phone even if the call is hands-free. People are incapable of focusing on two separate activities that require attention and this call blocking technology solves that problem. Unfortunately in the world of today most people rely on up to date information for their everyday lives including receiving information about their jobs and possibly even emergency information. If someone is on the road for quite a bit they will miss that information and be unable to properly respond until they get off the road. This technology has its pros and cons but surely can provide some benefits for drivers who want to stay focused but unable to otherwise.
Reference:
http://www.newsdial.com/technology/communication/cell-phone-statistics.html
Technology has recently surfaced that will disable cellphones while the owner is driving. The purpose of this new gadgetry is to attempt to reduce accident rates due to driver negligence while using cellphones while on the road. Instead of just turning off the cellphone which requires the user going against human nature and their developed addiction to the device the cellphone is rendered inactive as soon as the car starts moving. This insures that the driver will remain focused on the road without having to fear being interrupted by a call or text message. This technology works by using the phone's GPS to estimate the car's speed and there by only activate the phone when the vehicle is off the road. This latest form of technology is currently being evaluated in relation to the increasingly popular hands-free option which also attempts to provide for the safer use of cellphones in cars. Currently prominent companies such as Ford and Microsoft have backed hands-free technology by implementing systems that use features such as voice dialing and reading text messages aloud. While hands-free technology can assist drivers remain focused while placing calls some insurance companies are wary if benefits can last once the driver has become engrossed in the conversation. Though hands-free methods have been put to good use recently consumers and companies have started to consider safer alternatives such the call blocking technology. Recently Community Coffee a firm based out of Baton Rouge implemented this technology in 400 of their trucks and saw a 30% decrease in accident rates. Due to these and similar results insurance companies are starting to offer benefits for customers that agree to use this technology in their vehicles. If the technology can catch on it can decrease accident rates while decreasing the costs of automobile insurance.
This technology provides obvious benefits in the way of safety while driving. If drivers start to use new gadgets like this there is sure to be a drop in accident rates. While hand-free technology allows users to more safely access their phones it does factor in the lack of focus once the driver is on the phone even if the call is hands-free. People are incapable of focusing on two separate activities that require attention and this call blocking technology solves that problem. Unfortunately in the world of today most people rely on up to date information for their everyday lives including receiving information about their jobs and possibly even emergency information. If someone is on the road for quite a bit they will miss that information and be unable to properly respond until they get off the road. This technology has its pros and cons but surely can provide some benefits for drivers who want to stay focused but unable to otherwise.
Reference:
http://www.newsdial.com/technology/communication/cell-phone-statistics.html
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Journal 12, November 15th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10398073-245.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1
Recently a number of technologists from prominent organizations and businesses such as NASA, Google, Microsoft, the World Bank, and others met at the first Random Hacks of Kindness event to discuss and present new technologies that could be used in case of disaster. Coders from the various attendees worked for two days on developing ways that technology could be used to help solve real-world problems especially when traditional methods of communication and response are rendered unavailable. The participants worked on a number of tools that took advantage of technologies such as social networking sites like Twitter and apps for mobile devices for easily sharing information that could not be communicated otherwise. Other projects included utilizing digital maps in order to help locate those in need of aid. First place went to a team mainly formed of people from NASA that created an app that would notify a designated group of people to tell them the user was safe with a single button. Previously NASA coders have created a tool that could be used to take pictures in order to inform authorities of the status of each area affected by disaster such as the location of wildfires. NASA has also stated that it would like to share data obtained from various satellites and other data collecting tools. Officials hope that experts will be able to put these resources to good use by designing programs and applications that could be put to good use in case of emergency. The organizers of the Random Hacks of Kindness event will be the start of a technological community focused on bigger picture problems that affect everyone. The next event will take place just next year in Washington DC.
This event is an excellent example of what the field of technology can offer the people of the world especially when rivals of industry work together in order to help make sure the world is prepared for what ever disaster it may face. With the use of technology the world can become a much safer place where people can be equipped to handle any situation that might occur. This gathering of technology professionals is a great start to a community that can help make this world a safer place for al that live in it.
Reference:
http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/random-hacks-of-kindness-disas.html
Recently a number of technologists from prominent organizations and businesses such as NASA, Google, Microsoft, the World Bank, and others met at the first Random Hacks of Kindness event to discuss and present new technologies that could be used in case of disaster. Coders from the various attendees worked for two days on developing ways that technology could be used to help solve real-world problems especially when traditional methods of communication and response are rendered unavailable. The participants worked on a number of tools that took advantage of technologies such as social networking sites like Twitter and apps for mobile devices for easily sharing information that could not be communicated otherwise. Other projects included utilizing digital maps in order to help locate those in need of aid. First place went to a team mainly formed of people from NASA that created an app that would notify a designated group of people to tell them the user was safe with a single button. Previously NASA coders have created a tool that could be used to take pictures in order to inform authorities of the status of each area affected by disaster such as the location of wildfires. NASA has also stated that it would like to share data obtained from various satellites and other data collecting tools. Officials hope that experts will be able to put these resources to good use by designing programs and applications that could be put to good use in case of emergency. The organizers of the Random Hacks of Kindness event will be the start of a technological community focused on bigger picture problems that affect everyone. The next event will take place just next year in Washington DC.
This event is an excellent example of what the field of technology can offer the people of the world especially when rivals of industry work together in order to help make sure the world is prepared for what ever disaster it may face. With the use of technology the world can become a much safer place where people can be equipped to handle any situation that might occur. This gathering of technology professionals is a great start to a community that can help make this world a safer place for al that live in it.
Reference:
http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/random-hacks-of-kindness-disas.html
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Journal 11, November 8th
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/05/does-technology-reduce-social-isolation/?ref=technology
According to a recent survey by the Pew Internet and American Life Project the average American's social circle today is smaller today than twenty years ago but new technology such as social networking sites and cell phones are not to blame. Based on a telephone survey that polled 2512 adults residing in the continental United States, the Pew discovered that in fact people who use digital technologies on a regular bases are more likely to frequent social sites such as parks and cafes and are participate in local organizations. On the contrary the study indicated that people today are less likely to know their neighbors and interact with them compared to before the use of these technologies. To gather this information Pew asked questions that would usurp previous findings that linked the use of digital technologies to social isolation. Although the Pew did agree with other studies about the average number of intimate friendships dropping from three in 1985 to 2 the Pew found that only six percent of people thought they had no one they could confide in which is not a significant increase. In addition the survey revealed that users of mobile phones tend to have a twelve percent larger circle of friends compared to those who do not use cell phones. Also the Pew was able to confirm that people's social circles in America are becoming less diverse but those who do utilize digital technologies participate in more diverse groups than nonusers. Finally as to be expected people still prefer face-to-face communication when interacting with friends and family members.
It is obvious that new technology has created many different opportunities to communicate with friends and family but it is the user's choice when deciding how to put that technology to good use. Technology such as cell phones and social networking site give people an excellent chance to stay in touch but if they do not use it to do so they are not taking advantage of its full potential. These technologies are only the start of a social process that brings people together. After they get in touch it is up to the individual to go out and interact with the rest of the world.
Reference:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/18--Social-Isolation-and-New-Technology.aspx
According to a recent survey by the Pew Internet and American Life Project the average American's social circle today is smaller today than twenty years ago but new technology such as social networking sites and cell phones are not to blame. Based on a telephone survey that polled 2512 adults residing in the continental United States, the Pew discovered that in fact people who use digital technologies on a regular bases are more likely to frequent social sites such as parks and cafes and are participate in local organizations. On the contrary the study indicated that people today are less likely to know their neighbors and interact with them compared to before the use of these technologies. To gather this information Pew asked questions that would usurp previous findings that linked the use of digital technologies to social isolation. Although the Pew did agree with other studies about the average number of intimate friendships dropping from three in 1985 to 2 the Pew found that only six percent of people thought they had no one they could confide in which is not a significant increase. In addition the survey revealed that users of mobile phones tend to have a twelve percent larger circle of friends compared to those who do not use cell phones. Also the Pew was able to confirm that people's social circles in America are becoming less diverse but those who do utilize digital technologies participate in more diverse groups than nonusers. Finally as to be expected people still prefer face-to-face communication when interacting with friends and family members.
It is obvious that new technology has created many different opportunities to communicate with friends and family but it is the user's choice when deciding how to put that technology to good use. Technology such as cell phones and social networking site give people an excellent chance to stay in touch but if they do not use it to do so they are not taking advantage of its full potential. These technologies are only the start of a social process that brings people together. After they get in touch it is up to the individual to go out and interact with the rest of the world.
Reference:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/18--Social-Isolation-and-New-Technology.aspx
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Journal 10, November 1st
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/business/01proto.html?_r=2&ref=technology
Recently businesses have taken the lead of software designers, sharing their ideas for green innovation through open source patents. Through the sharing of green initiatives companies will be able to share what they have discovered while not jeopardizing their positions in the competitive market. Due to the fact that green solutions do not directly tie into a company's business practices there is little risk that sharing these new ideas will hold negative consequences. Also these new methods for maintaining a green and sustainable business can be utilized across all types of industry. Therefore companies can feel free to share their in house technology with other industries without fear of competition. Once this practice of having open patents get started more and more companies will participate as soon as they realize the potential. Soon there will be communities built where businesses can share ideas and track who is using who's ideas. If this practice is accepted companies will be able to take advantage of a free flow of ideas, all meant to create a green society that can be sustained for years to come. There are many incentives for sharing technology for the companies as well. For letting other businesses use their patents companies can collect annual fees making a little extra money for their innovation and generosity. Even though this novel idea has many benefits it does not coincide with the normal manner of patents. Without proper authorization and preparation, participating businesses could be penalized for infringement on patents.
Even though this idea does not follow the traditional way of doing business it is an excellent way for companies to contribute to the advancement of green technology and in the process gain advantages that they never had before. As with the open source movement in software development, collaboration between companies pertaining to green technology is a great way to contribute to the field and help develop new techniques that would have not have been possible any other way. With these new business practices firms can start to interact as the rest of the world already has using modern technology and can start to work together to create a sustainable environment that we can all benefit from.
Reference:
http://sciencecommons.org/projects/greenxchange/
Recently businesses have taken the lead of software designers, sharing their ideas for green innovation through open source patents. Through the sharing of green initiatives companies will be able to share what they have discovered while not jeopardizing their positions in the competitive market. Due to the fact that green solutions do not directly tie into a company's business practices there is little risk that sharing these new ideas will hold negative consequences. Also these new methods for maintaining a green and sustainable business can be utilized across all types of industry. Therefore companies can feel free to share their in house technology with other industries without fear of competition. Once this practice of having open patents get started more and more companies will participate as soon as they realize the potential. Soon there will be communities built where businesses can share ideas and track who is using who's ideas. If this practice is accepted companies will be able to take advantage of a free flow of ideas, all meant to create a green society that can be sustained for years to come. There are many incentives for sharing technology for the companies as well. For letting other businesses use their patents companies can collect annual fees making a little extra money for their innovation and generosity. Even though this novel idea has many benefits it does not coincide with the normal manner of patents. Without proper authorization and preparation, participating businesses could be penalized for infringement on patents.
Even though this idea does not follow the traditional way of doing business it is an excellent way for companies to contribute to the advancement of green technology and in the process gain advantages that they never had before. As with the open source movement in software development, collaboration between companies pertaining to green technology is a great way to contribute to the field and help develop new techniques that would have not have been possible any other way. With these new business practices firms can start to interact as the rest of the world already has using modern technology and can start to work together to create a sustainable environment that we can all benefit from.
Reference:
http://sciencecommons.org/projects/greenxchange/
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Journal 9, October 25th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-10381355-266.html
Last Thursday the Federal Communications Commission unanimously voted to begin the process to create regulations in order to preserve the internet as an open form of communication. Although in favor of gathering research, Republican Attwell Baker does not see much point in specific rules because she believes there is little threat to internet openness. Leading up to the vote there was much debate on the subject with principle web companies like Google and upstarts agreeing that the internet's openness be preserved with prominent internet service providers were wary of intrusive regulation. Phone companies like AT&T and Verizon are fearful that the new regulation will target mostly network traffic causing higher costs and hassle to the companies responsible for handling that traffic. The new policies would prevent ISPs from viewing data sent on their network for any reason. This includes illegal activities such as pirated software and other unlawful uses of the companies' network. In addition to letting illegal activities go unnoticed the new policies would make it impossible for ISPs to increase efficiency by sorting data by type to allow for faster processing of data. While ISPs announce their disdain of the proposed plan open advocacy groups like the Open Internet Coalition, Public Knowledge, and Free Press are praising the FCC for their decision.
This decision is an important milestone in the history of the internet. Rarely has the United States enacted any policy to regulate or otherwise affect the internet. At least in the United States the internet has acted as a platform where free speech can flourish with minimal meddling by the government or anyone else who might choose to impede that right. Hopefully these new policies from the FCC will continue this tradition so that the internet can remain a safe-haven for free expression and wont be the start of a trend to regulate a once free space.
Reference:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/172371/fccs_net_neutrality_plan_draws_fast_fire.html
Last Thursday the Federal Communications Commission unanimously voted to begin the process to create regulations in order to preserve the internet as an open form of communication. Although in favor of gathering research, Republican Attwell Baker does not see much point in specific rules because she believes there is little threat to internet openness. Leading up to the vote there was much debate on the subject with principle web companies like Google and upstarts agreeing that the internet's openness be preserved with prominent internet service providers were wary of intrusive regulation. Phone companies like AT&T and Verizon are fearful that the new regulation will target mostly network traffic causing higher costs and hassle to the companies responsible for handling that traffic. The new policies would prevent ISPs from viewing data sent on their network for any reason. This includes illegal activities such as pirated software and other unlawful uses of the companies' network. In addition to letting illegal activities go unnoticed the new policies would make it impossible for ISPs to increase efficiency by sorting data by type to allow for faster processing of data. While ISPs announce their disdain of the proposed plan open advocacy groups like the Open Internet Coalition, Public Knowledge, and Free Press are praising the FCC for their decision.
This decision is an important milestone in the history of the internet. Rarely has the United States enacted any policy to regulate or otherwise affect the internet. At least in the United States the internet has acted as a platform where free speech can flourish with minimal meddling by the government or anyone else who might choose to impede that right. Hopefully these new policies from the FCC will continue this tradition so that the internet can remain a safe-haven for free expression and wont be the start of a trend to regulate a once free space.
Reference:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/172371/fccs_net_neutrality_plan_draws_fast_fire.html
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Journl 8, October 18th
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8309583.stm
Recently Uruguay has become the first country to provide a computer for every child attending public elementary school. The new program has incorporated over 362,000 students and some 18,000 teachers in just the past two years. Plan Ceibal (Education Connect) has brought successfully been able to bring computers and the internet to many families for the very first time. To implement the program Uruguay has turned to the One Laptop Per Child project organized by Nicholas Negroponte. The original goal of the project was to create a modern laptop that could be produced for only $100. The final cost was a bit more at $216 for each laptop but that price includes extra features and services such as maintenance costs, equipment repairs, training for the teachers and internet connection. Even at the increased cost the Uruguay program represents less than 5% of the country's education budget. To attempt to implement the computers teachers have already been trained and encouraged to use the computers in the classroom. The laptops use an open source version of Linux that has been criticized because it is not one of the mainstream operating systems. However the introduction of any kind of computer system is seen as an improvement and is seen as an excellent start for more programs to use technology. Now that the children have the computers Uruguay must now maintain the program and be an example for other countries in similar situations.
The One Laptop Per Child project is an excellent effort to spread the benefits of technology all over the world. With a laptop in hand children are capable of accessing a world's worth of information to aid them in their studies. Also with use of the internet even the most rural areas of undeveloped countries can stay connected to the rest of the world to help even the plain. This is an example of what benefits technology is capable of and how important it is to take advantage of it wherever possible.
Reference:
http://laptop.org/en/vision/mission/index.shtml
Recently Uruguay has become the first country to provide a computer for every child attending public elementary school. The new program has incorporated over 362,000 students and some 18,000 teachers in just the past two years. Plan Ceibal (Education Connect) has brought successfully been able to bring computers and the internet to many families for the very first time. To implement the program Uruguay has turned to the One Laptop Per Child project organized by Nicholas Negroponte. The original goal of the project was to create a modern laptop that could be produced for only $100. The final cost was a bit more at $216 for each laptop but that price includes extra features and services such as maintenance costs, equipment repairs, training for the teachers and internet connection. Even at the increased cost the Uruguay program represents less than 5% of the country's education budget. To attempt to implement the computers teachers have already been trained and encouraged to use the computers in the classroom. The laptops use an open source version of Linux that has been criticized because it is not one of the mainstream operating systems. However the introduction of any kind of computer system is seen as an improvement and is seen as an excellent start for more programs to use technology. Now that the children have the computers Uruguay must now maintain the program and be an example for other countries in similar situations.
The One Laptop Per Child project is an excellent effort to spread the benefits of technology all over the world. With a laptop in hand children are capable of accessing a world's worth of information to aid them in their studies. Also with use of the internet even the most rural areas of undeveloped countries can stay connected to the rest of the world to help even the plain. This is an example of what benefits technology is capable of and how important it is to take advantage of it wherever possible.
Reference:
http://laptop.org/en/vision/mission/index.shtml
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Journal 7, October 11th
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/business/energy-environment/12iht-green.html?_r=1&ref=technology
Technology based companies like Google and Twitter have made life much more manageable but at the same time consumed vast amounts of energy to do so. To keep up with the scores of digital information necessary for the upkeep of the internet and countless office computers technology companies have erected data centers all over the world. These data centers in the United States alone use 1.5% of the entire countries power usage in 2006 and according to government these figures are set to double in just five years. Experts say there are plenty of ways to improve efficiency of power use by these data centers. Costs are obviously causing a loss to companies for example the power for a server over its useful life exceeds the initial cost of the hardware itself. Part of the problem lies in keeping these data centers cool. To allow chips work at maximum efficiency data centers must be kept below 80 degrees Fahrenheit which means money and power must be spent on expensive cooling equipment. To accommodate this potential expense businesses are taking advantage of alternate cooling methods, like the weather. Recently Microsoft built a data center in Ireland to take advantage of the sites cooler temperatures. In addition to considering innovative ways to design and implement data centers companies are also trying to gauge the exact amount of energy they are using so that they be aware of their impact. This way companies will be more easily able to manage their power usage so they can operate as efficiently as possible.
If technology is to be properly integrated into society companies must be sure that energy efficiency is one of their top concerns. As the rest of the world attempts to become "greener" so must the field of technology. It is essential that companies plan for the future by implementing the most cost affective and energy efficient methods today so that society will pay less in the future.
Reference:
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/08/reducing_data_c.html;jsessionid=TNBTMEOUUSXCZQE1GHPSKH4ATMY32JVN
Technology based companies like Google and Twitter have made life much more manageable but at the same time consumed vast amounts of energy to do so. To keep up with the scores of digital information necessary for the upkeep of the internet and countless office computers technology companies have erected data centers all over the world. These data centers in the United States alone use 1.5% of the entire countries power usage in 2006 and according to government these figures are set to double in just five years. Experts say there are plenty of ways to improve efficiency of power use by these data centers. Costs are obviously causing a loss to companies for example the power for a server over its useful life exceeds the initial cost of the hardware itself. Part of the problem lies in keeping these data centers cool. To allow chips work at maximum efficiency data centers must be kept below 80 degrees Fahrenheit which means money and power must be spent on expensive cooling equipment. To accommodate this potential expense businesses are taking advantage of alternate cooling methods, like the weather. Recently Microsoft built a data center in Ireland to take advantage of the sites cooler temperatures. In addition to considering innovative ways to design and implement data centers companies are also trying to gauge the exact amount of energy they are using so that they be aware of their impact. This way companies will be more easily able to manage their power usage so they can operate as efficiently as possible.
If technology is to be properly integrated into society companies must be sure that energy efficiency is one of their top concerns. As the rest of the world attempts to become "greener" so must the field of technology. It is essential that companies plan for the future by implementing the most cost affective and energy efficient methods today so that society will pay less in the future.
Reference:
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/08/reducing_data_c.html;jsessionid=TNBTMEOUUSXCZQE1GHPSKH4ATMY32JVN
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Journal 6, October 4th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-10364590-266.html?tag=mncol
According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) bringing broadband internet to the entire United States will not be cheap. The FCC has been put in charge of forming a national broadband policy that would ensure that every American has access to broadband internet. Last Tuesday the FCC task force issued its initial report which estimated the project would cost more than $350 billion to bring universal broadband to the United States. This estimate is the result of many workshops and hearings that will continue until the FCC presents its final report to Congress in February. While it is estimated that it would only cost approximately $20 billion to set up nationwide broadband at speeds between 768Kbps and 3Mbps, the FCC has concluded that these speeds would be insufficient for future computing demands. Therefore the FCC has suggested a plan that would allow 100Mbps or greater and cost around $350 billion if not higher. This exorbitant price can be attributed to a number of factors in delivering nationwide broadband. One such factor is the process of implementing the service in rural areas where not only capital costs are high but upkeep expenses as well. As of now Congress has appropriated $7 billion to the project and is expected to contribute more tax payer money but the bulk of the funding will come from the private sector. FCC has decided that it is necessary to implement faster networks to accommodate the "bandwidth-intensive applications" that will become popular among users in the near future. These include include streaming video, video teleconferencing, and electronic medical monitoring, all which require significantly more bandwidth. The FCC is also looking into implementing policy for the use of wireless networks and expanding the wireless spectrum available for commercial use.
Expanding the United State's availability of broadband internet has many obvious benefits not only to consumers but also to businesses and government programs. With a more robust national network people will be able to communicate like never before to even the most remote parts of the country. Also having access to quicker speeds will allow users to take advantage of the newest technology and stay on the cutting edge. Although a nationwide broadband policy would incur high costs it will ultimately become a necessity and be implemented eventually due to popular demand.
Reference:
http://www.wral.com/news/technology/story/4913467/
According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) bringing broadband internet to the entire United States will not be cheap. The FCC has been put in charge of forming a national broadband policy that would ensure that every American has access to broadband internet. Last Tuesday the FCC task force issued its initial report which estimated the project would cost more than $350 billion to bring universal broadband to the United States. This estimate is the result of many workshops and hearings that will continue until the FCC presents its final report to Congress in February. While it is estimated that it would only cost approximately $20 billion to set up nationwide broadband at speeds between 768Kbps and 3Mbps, the FCC has concluded that these speeds would be insufficient for future computing demands. Therefore the FCC has suggested a plan that would allow 100Mbps or greater and cost around $350 billion if not higher. This exorbitant price can be attributed to a number of factors in delivering nationwide broadband. One such factor is the process of implementing the service in rural areas where not only capital costs are high but upkeep expenses as well. As of now Congress has appropriated $7 billion to the project and is expected to contribute more tax payer money but the bulk of the funding will come from the private sector. FCC has decided that it is necessary to implement faster networks to accommodate the "bandwidth-intensive applications" that will become popular among users in the near future. These include include streaming video, video teleconferencing, and electronic medical monitoring, all which require significantly more bandwidth. The FCC is also looking into implementing policy for the use of wireless networks and expanding the wireless spectrum available for commercial use.
Expanding the United State's availability of broadband internet has many obvious benefits not only to consumers but also to businesses and government programs. With a more robust national network people will be able to communicate like never before to even the most remote parts of the country. Also having access to quicker speeds will allow users to take advantage of the newest technology and stay on the cutting edge. Although a nationwide broadband policy would incur high costs it will ultimately become a necessity and be implemented eventually due to popular demand.
Reference:
http://www.wral.com/news/technology/story/4913467/
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Journal 5, September 27th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10797_3-10360849-235.html?tag=mncol;txt
According to a survey done by he Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics and the Health Care Compliance Association employee social networking is becoming more prevalent than ever before. Employees using social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter to post just about everything that occurs during their day, on and off the job. This type of activity may pose a threat to companies if employees were to post private information or other material that could threaten business. Although most organizations are hesitant to enact any policy on employee activity outside of work, some organizations like the United States Marine Corps have banned the use of social networking sites altogether. While some companies have noted this trend the survey found that most have not. Out of the businesses surveyed most had no policy at all concerning social networking outside of the office. The survey also discovered that of the companies that do have a policy the procedure does not specifically address social networking.
In addition the survey found that most companies have no system for monitoring employee posts even in the office. Most businesses wait for something negative to happen before acting. This survey points out that companies have not kept up with modern technology trends and are not equipped to keep their businesses in check. While this arrangement persists companies will remain exposed and if they do not act quickly employees may reject policies that prevent them from doing what they have done for years without consequence.
As of now social networking sites have the potential to make giant holes in company security if employee posting is not put under control. Companies need to realize that social networking is here to stay and update their system to make sure they are not left exposed. If companies can see what social networking is capable not only will they be protected from it but they can also take advantage of it. Social networking is an excellent way to communicate not only with those within the industry but also potential customers. Companies need to use all the resources that are available to succeed meaning keeping up with the latest technology to make sure thy are not left behind the curve.
Reference:
http://cityflight.com/?p=532
According to a survey done by he Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics and the Health Care Compliance Association employee social networking is becoming more prevalent than ever before. Employees using social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter to post just about everything that occurs during their day, on and off the job. This type of activity may pose a threat to companies if employees were to post private information or other material that could threaten business. Although most organizations are hesitant to enact any policy on employee activity outside of work, some organizations like the United States Marine Corps have banned the use of social networking sites altogether. While some companies have noted this trend the survey found that most have not. Out of the businesses surveyed most had no policy at all concerning social networking outside of the office. The survey also discovered that of the companies that do have a policy the procedure does not specifically address social networking.
In addition the survey found that most companies have no system for monitoring employee posts even in the office. Most businesses wait for something negative to happen before acting. This survey points out that companies have not kept up with modern technology trends and are not equipped to keep their businesses in check. While this arrangement persists companies will remain exposed and if they do not act quickly employees may reject policies that prevent them from doing what they have done for years without consequence.
As of now social networking sites have the potential to make giant holes in company security if employee posting is not put under control. Companies need to realize that social networking is here to stay and update their system to make sure they are not left exposed. If companies can see what social networking is capable not only will they be protected from it but they can also take advantage of it. Social networking is an excellent way to communicate not only with those within the industry but also potential customers. Companies need to use all the resources that are available to succeed meaning keeping up with the latest technology to make sure thy are not left behind the curve.
Reference:
http://cityflight.com/?p=532
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Journal 4, September 20th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10353479-52.html?tag=mncol
Recently the Obama administration announced a long term plan to implement cloud computing into government policy in an attempt to cut costs and reduce the government's environmental impact. The plan aims to influence current infrastructure while reducing information technology costs including expensive data centers. Of the $76 billion information technology budget $19 billion is spent on infrastructure alone and with the current policy energy consumption has doubled from 200 to 2006. Now the government plans to use existing infrastructure as efficiently as possible while keeping security considerations in mind. For example for the update of USA.gov site took only one day implementing cloud computing instead of six months and saved nearly $2 million. Although the specifics of the new programs are still vague projects like the new Apps.gov show potential for the value of these policies. With these new services government agencies can access what they need without any additional resources spent in information technology. In addition to providing services easily accessible services to government agencies the cloud computing initiative will be implemented in budgeting. This effort will start slow but is planned to be fully implemented within the next two years. Later cloud computing is planned to become a part of policy planning and system architecture. The government is obviously taking the private market's lead and finally starting to reap the benefits of modern technology. An example of this is the federal financial aid form, FAFSA. After being streamlined with the use of technology the form can now be completed online with many fields already filled in based on previously provided information.
This new initiative is an excellent way to save money while using modern technology to make the government operate more efficiently. With programs of this nature the government will be better equipped to tend to the wants and needs of its citizens. These new policies are a step in the right direction that everyone can agree on and almost everyone can take advantage of to make their dealings with government all the more smoother. Hopefully this trend of using the latest technology to enhance government services will continue so that citizens can be assured that their taxes are being put to good use.
Recently the Obama administration announced a long term plan to implement cloud computing into government policy in an attempt to cut costs and reduce the government's environmental impact. The plan aims to influence current infrastructure while reducing information technology costs including expensive data centers. Of the $76 billion information technology budget $19 billion is spent on infrastructure alone and with the current policy energy consumption has doubled from 200 to 2006. Now the government plans to use existing infrastructure as efficiently as possible while keeping security considerations in mind. For example for the update of USA.gov site took only one day implementing cloud computing instead of six months and saved nearly $2 million. Although the specifics of the new programs are still vague projects like the new Apps.gov show potential for the value of these policies. With these new services government agencies can access what they need without any additional resources spent in information technology. In addition to providing services easily accessible services to government agencies the cloud computing initiative will be implemented in budgeting. This effort will start slow but is planned to be fully implemented within the next two years. Later cloud computing is planned to become a part of policy planning and system architecture. The government is obviously taking the private market's lead and finally starting to reap the benefits of modern technology. An example of this is the federal financial aid form, FAFSA. After being streamlined with the use of technology the form can now be completed online with many fields already filled in based on previously provided information.
This new initiative is an excellent way to save money while using modern technology to make the government operate more efficiently. With programs of this nature the government will be better equipped to tend to the wants and needs of its citizens. These new policies are a step in the right direction that everyone can agree on and almost everyone can take advantage of to make their dealings with government all the more smoother. Hopefully this trend of using the latest technology to enhance government services will continue so that citizens can be assured that their taxes are being put to good use.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Journal 3, September 13th
http://scitech.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/08/trapped-girls-update-facebook-instead-of-calling-cops/
Recently in Australia two girls were trapped in a storm drain and instead of calling emergency services or their parents the girls chose to post their predicament on Facebook using a phone. Luckily one of their friends spotted the post and called the authorities who were able to bring the girls to safety. Even though the girls could of called for the authorities the girls opted to to try and go around the professionals by only notifying their friends. Unfortunately, according to the rescuers this causes a delay that uses up precious time when responding to an emergency. Coincidentally in the United States the Atlanta based nonprofit, The Safe America Foundation is now working with the federal government to implement other forms of communication in case of an emergency. This would include everything from social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter to just a simple text message. According to the article this type of situation has occurred many times already. People are using these new types of communication for everything all over the world whether the authorities are up to date or not.
Modern technology has given people copious ways to connect which is invaluable to have when you just want someone to talk to or you really need help. If emergency services can implement these technologies people can be safer than ever. Today, just about everybody has a cell phone or some other way to communicate which could be used anywhere to contact anybody. At this point in time is the technology is readily available but has yet to be used as a means of contacting the authorities in case of trouble. If local authorities were to update their systems to use these technologies it would be an excellent asset to communities and allow the professionals to work more efficiently than ever. Until they update their system though the use of these new ways to communicate will only cause delays and possibly increase the risk of injury if the proper help in not notified in time.
Recently in Australia two girls were trapped in a storm drain and instead of calling emergency services or their parents the girls chose to post their predicament on Facebook using a phone. Luckily one of their friends spotted the post and called the authorities who were able to bring the girls to safety. Even though the girls could of called for the authorities the girls opted to to try and go around the professionals by only notifying their friends. Unfortunately, according to the rescuers this causes a delay that uses up precious time when responding to an emergency. Coincidentally in the United States the Atlanta based nonprofit, The Safe America Foundation is now working with the federal government to implement other forms of communication in case of an emergency. This would include everything from social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter to just a simple text message. According to the article this type of situation has occurred many times already. People are using these new types of communication for everything all over the world whether the authorities are up to date or not.
Modern technology has given people copious ways to connect which is invaluable to have when you just want someone to talk to or you really need help. If emergency services can implement these technologies people can be safer than ever. Today, just about everybody has a cell phone or some other way to communicate which could be used anywhere to contact anybody. At this point in time is the technology is readily available but has yet to be used as a means of contacting the authorities in case of trouble. If local authorities were to update their systems to use these technologies it would be an excellent asset to communities and allow the professionals to work more efficiently than ever. Until they update their system though the use of these new ways to communicate will only cause delays and possibly increase the risk of injury if the proper help in not notified in time.
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Journal 2, September 5th
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/02/technology/02survey.html
The article describes how new technology has infiltrated American homes faster than ever. Instead of being coveted by only the tech savvy "gadget geeks" cutting edge technology has made its way into the homes of mainstream America.According to a study done by Forrester Research a majority of homes in the United States have access to broadband internet, cell phones, PCs, and HDTVs. HDTV ownership in particular is on the rise in relation to previous years and within the next five years it is projected that as much as seventy percent of homes will own one. In addition the study discovered that even with the recession online shopping has not suffered. With new family friendly technology such as digital cameras, cell phones, and the Nintendo Wii families are able to bring people together and capture precious memories with ease like never before. Also with the rise of the internet people are becoming more reliant on e-commerce to conduct business. Using technology people are able to get out of the office and work from home with little trouble. The article also points out that even as most new technologies are being put to use some still have not been noticed, such as home networks.
Although the amount of new technology available to the public is increasing does not mean that Americans are more willing to buy it compared to the past. Americans have always been eager to try out new gadgets whether it be a Blue-ray player or a VCR. Today there is just much more technology that can easily be fit into mainstream America's life. Recently technology has made the jump from a luxury to a necessity which sparked this transition. People use technology for more than just entertainment as they did in the past. Technology is relied upon for everything from work to keeping up with family. Technology is now an integrated part of everybody's life and to keep up people need to stay on the cutting edge.
The article describes how new technology has infiltrated American homes faster than ever. Instead of being coveted by only the tech savvy "gadget geeks" cutting edge technology has made its way into the homes of mainstream America.According to a study done by Forrester Research a majority of homes in the United States have access to broadband internet, cell phones, PCs, and HDTVs. HDTV ownership in particular is on the rise in relation to previous years and within the next five years it is projected that as much as seventy percent of homes will own one. In addition the study discovered that even with the recession online shopping has not suffered. With new family friendly technology such as digital cameras, cell phones, and the Nintendo Wii families are able to bring people together and capture precious memories with ease like never before. Also with the rise of the internet people are becoming more reliant on e-commerce to conduct business. Using technology people are able to get out of the office and work from home with little trouble. The article also points out that even as most new technologies are being put to use some still have not been noticed, such as home networks.
Although the amount of new technology available to the public is increasing does not mean that Americans are more willing to buy it compared to the past. Americans have always been eager to try out new gadgets whether it be a Blue-ray player or a VCR. Today there is just much more technology that can easily be fit into mainstream America's life. Recently technology has made the jump from a luxury to a necessity which sparked this transition. People use technology for more than just entertainment as they did in the past. Technology is relied upon for everything from work to keeping up with family. Technology is now an integrated part of everybody's life and to keep up people need to stay on the cutting edge.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Journal 1, August 30th
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10317186-1.html?tag=mncol
This article describes an experiment preformed by researchers at Stanford University to determine the effects of multitasking on the human brain. According to the article, the study took a group of people who often multitask and a group that did not and put them through a series of tests to determine the differences between them. In the study the participants were put through three simple tests to assess their memory, ability to focus, and skill switching between tasks. In all three tests the people who did not usually multitask outperformed the ones who commonly did. The study showed that those who multitask regularly show a decreased ability to focus, have a harder time remembering, and even are inferior at switching in between tasks. At the time the article was written the researchers were still trying to determine whether the traits of multitaskers were learned or were present at birth. The article then demonstrates that in a world full of technology it is hard to find someone who does not multitask.
With the ability to communicate instantly with texting or social networking, listen to music, and stream video all simultaneously it is almost impossible to imagine living without multitasking. Unfortunately, according the study done by Stanford and other research, multitaskers are only harming themselves. In “The Myth of Multitasking” Christine Rosen, senior editor of The New Atlantis argues that humans are actually incapable of true multitasking because we are only able to focus on one task at a time. Unlike modern computers that are designed to be able to perform parallel processing the human brain can only pay attention to one item. Since humans are only able to perform a single task at a time a shift of attention must occur, when switching from one task to another. It is in this shift that any benefits of multitasking are lost and in the long run productivity is in fact harmed. With the rise of the internet and other technology meant to share information our ability to perform multiple jobs seemingly at the same time has rapidly increased, changing the way society operates. In actuality though not knowing our limits as humans may ultimately weaken our ability to complete what needs to be done even with all the opportunities offered by current technology.
This article describes an experiment preformed by researchers at Stanford University to determine the effects of multitasking on the human brain. According to the article, the study took a group of people who often multitask and a group that did not and put them through a series of tests to determine the differences between them. In the study the participants were put through three simple tests to assess their memory, ability to focus, and skill switching between tasks. In all three tests the people who did not usually multitask outperformed the ones who commonly did. The study showed that those who multitask regularly show a decreased ability to focus, have a harder time remembering, and even are inferior at switching in between tasks. At the time the article was written the researchers were still trying to determine whether the traits of multitaskers were learned or were present at birth. The article then demonstrates that in a world full of technology it is hard to find someone who does not multitask.
With the ability to communicate instantly with texting or social networking, listen to music, and stream video all simultaneously it is almost impossible to imagine living without multitasking. Unfortunately, according the study done by Stanford and other research, multitaskers are only harming themselves. In “The Myth of Multitasking” Christine Rosen, senior editor of The New Atlantis argues that humans are actually incapable of true multitasking because we are only able to focus on one task at a time. Unlike modern computers that are designed to be able to perform parallel processing the human brain can only pay attention to one item. Since humans are only able to perform a single task at a time a shift of attention must occur, when switching from one task to another. It is in this shift that any benefits of multitasking are lost and in the long run productivity is in fact harmed. With the rise of the internet and other technology meant to share information our ability to perform multiple jobs seemingly at the same time has rapidly increased, changing the way society operates. In actuality though not knowing our limits as humans may ultimately weaken our ability to complete what needs to be done even with all the opportunities offered by current technology.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)